You are here
State v. Mumin
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
A-13-0783, State v. Dukhan Iqraa Jihad Mumin (Appellant)
Lancaster County District Court, Judge Karen Flowers
Attorney for Appellant: John Jorgensen (Lancaster County Public Defender’s Office)
Attorney for Appellee: Jon Bruning, George R. Love (Attorney General’s Office)
Criminal: Possession of a Controlled Substance; Habitual Criminal
Action Taken by Trial Court: After a stipulated trial to the court, Appellant was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance. A hearing was held concerning the habitual criminal allegation and the appellant was found to be a habitual criminal. The appellant was sentenced to 10 years’ to 20 years’ imprisonment.
Assignment of Errors on Appeal: The appellant assigns that the district court erred by overruling his motion to suppress and admitting all evidence obtained; that trial counsel was ineffective; and that the sentence imposed was excessive.
This page was last modified on Wednesday, October 15, 2014