Home >> Cip Caselaw >> Keisha


Filed on
Tuesday, April 28, 2015
Summary: The father, Michael G., appealed the termination of his parental rights under 43-292(2) & (7), arguing that there was insufficient evidence and that the court erred in finding that the formal rules of evidence did not apply. The Court of Appeals found that case law is clear that formal...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
SUMMARY: Since the rights advisement at adjudication didn’t include termination of parental rights as a possible consequence, 43-292(6) cannot be a ground for termination. The evidence didn’t support the remaining TPR ground because there was no showing how the father’s prior drug use made him...Read more
Subscribe to RSS - Keisha