Home >> Cip Caselaw >> time


Filed on
Tuesday, June 10, 2014
SUMMARY: Continued protective custody of the children was appropriate where the mother failed to follow a safety plan of appropriately monitoring the children in a case with sexual abuse history. An 8-month time lapse between removal and completion of the Protective Custody Hearing did not violate...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
SUMMARY: A court’s denial to reinstate visitation when the TPR was set for four months later is temporary and not final and appealable. In November 2010, Nery was removed from the family home pursuant to N.R.S. 43-247(3)(a). On December 8, 2010, a motion to terminate parental rights was filed as to...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, January 7, 2014
SUMMARY: Termination of the father’s parental rights was improper because the length of time in foster care cannot be the sole best interest factor when the parent is not unfit and the length of incarceration of the father was speculative even though it was the sole reason for the termination...Read more
Filed on
Friday, December 13, 2013
SUMMARY: An order setting conditions for supervised visitation was not a final, appealable order because it would have only affected the proceedings for one month until the hearing on the TPR motion. Dennisca is the mother of six children who were removed from her care in March 2011 due to domestic...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
SUMMARY: Termination of the mother’s parental rights was proper where she has had three prior involuntary terminations and has made no efforts in the short time of the current case to avail herself of services. Emily, DOB 4/11, is the fourth child of Amanda V. Amanda V. had her rights involuntarily...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
SUMMARY: Subsequent disposition orders are not appealable where they are a continuation of the provisions of previous orders, even if the parent’s circumstances have changed. Mya, DOB 12/06, and Sunday, DOB 1/08, are the children of Nyamal. A 3a petition was filed on September 24, 2010. At the time...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
SUMMARY: Termination of parental rights was proper where over a period of time after an appellate reversal of termination the father did not make significant progress toward reunification nor show the desire to do so. Ray’Cine, DOB 5/07, and Dejan, DOB 1/09, have been in foster care since birth...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
SUMMARY: Termination of parental rights was improper because the tribe was not initially given proper notice of the termination proceedings as required under ICWA, only notice of the adjudication proceedings, nor was it provided with notice of the amended pleadings at least 10 days prior to trial...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
SUMMARY: Termination of parental rights were proper where the mother had received parenting assistance since 2003 but failed to make sufficient progress to allow the children to return to her care. The children were removed from the home of the mother, Selina, on the following dates: Nyaliet,...Read more
Filed on
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
SUMMARY: An order suspending visits was not final and appealable because it was not a permanent termination of her visitation rights and the mother could regain those rights after a showing that visits were in the children’s best interests. The children, James, Xyanna and Dominick, were the subject...Read more


Subscribe to RSS - time