State v. Rolenc

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionPDF versionPDF version

State v. Rolenc

Case Number
Call Date
February 10, 2016
Case Time
1:00 PM
Case Summary

A-15-564, State v. Rolenc (Appellant)

Lancaster County, District Court Judge Robert R. Otte

Attorney for Appellant: Douglas J. Peterson, George R. Love (Attorney General's Office)

Attorney for Appellee: Joe Nigro, Kristi Egger Brown (Lancaster County Public Defender's Office)

Criminal Action: Motion to Suppress; Possession of a Controlled Substance

Action Taken by Trial Court: The district court denied appellant's motion to suppress. Following a stipulated bench trial, appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to 12-24 months' imprisonment.

Assignments of Error on Appeal: The appellant contends that district court erred in overruling his motion to suppress and that the sentence imposed is excessive.

Case Location
Panel Text
Moore, Chief Judge, Inbody, and Bishop, Judges