Oral Arguments are happening now. View them on the web or via Mobile App on iPhone / iPad or Android (4.0+).

Self-Help Center

You are here

§ 6-334. Production of documents, electronically stored information, and things and entry upon land for inspection and other purposes.

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

   (a) Scope. Any party may serve on any other party a request:

   (1) To produce and permit the party making the request, or someone acting on his or her behalf, to inspect, copy, test, or sample any designated documents or electronically stored information  (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound recordings, images, and other data or data compilations stored in any medium from which information can be obtained) translated, if necessary, by the respondent into reasonably usable form, or to inspect and copy, test, or sample any tangible things which constitute or contain matters within the scope of Rule 26(b) and which are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served; or

   (2) To permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon, within the scope of Rule 26(b).

   (b) Procedure. The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the summons upon that party. The request shall set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or by category, and describe each item and category with reasonable particularity. The request shall specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts. The request may specify the form or forms in which electronically stored information is to be produced.

   The party upon whom the request is served shall serve a written response within thirty days after the service of the request, except that a defendant may serve a response within forty-five days after service of the summons upon that defendant. The court may allow a shorter or longer time. The response shall state, with respect to each item or category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless the request is objected to, including an objection to the requested form or forms for producing electronically stored information, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated. If objection is made to part of an item or category, the part shall be specified and inspection permitted of the remaining parts. If objection is made to the requested form or forms for producing electronically stored information, or if no form was specified in the request, the responding party must state the form or forms it intends to use. The party submitting the request may move for an order under Rule 37(a) with respect to any objection to or other failure to respond to the request or any part thereof, or any failure to permit inspection as requested.

   Unless the parties otherwise agree, or the court otherwise orders:

   (1) a party who produces documents for inspection shall produce them as they are kept in the usual course of business or shall organize and label them to correspond with the categories in the request;

   (2) if a request does not specify the form or forms for producing electronically stored information, a responding party must produce the information in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a form or forms that are reasonably usable; and

   (3) a party need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

   (c) Persons Not Parties. This rule does not preclude an independent action against a person not a party for production of documents and things and permission to enter upon land.



   This rule follows the federal rule and changes former Nebraska law, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25‑1267.39 (Repealed 1982), by allowing production by notice instead of by court order. Many such examinations can be handled without need of a motion and order, so the proposal eliminates unnecessary steps. Rule 37 still allows a party to seek an order if that step is necessary.

Rule 34(a)(1) and 34(b)(1-3) amended June 4, 2008, effective July 18, 2008. Renumbered and codified as § 6-334, effective July 18, 2008.

This page was last modified on Wednesday, October 24, 2012