S-22-0939 David Meiergerd (Appellant) v. Qatalyst Corporation and Roland Pinto (Appellees)
Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County, Judge Susan I. Strong
Attorneys: Adam J. Kost (Remboldt Ludkte, L.L.P. for Appellant) and Christopher S. Bartling (Bartling & Hinkle, P.C. for Nebraska for Appellee)
Civil: Taxable income
Proceedings below: In a Memorandum Opinion and Judgment on Appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision to sustain Appellee’s motion for satisfaction and discharge of a revived May 2008 default judgment. Appellant filed a Petition for Further Review, which the Supreme Court granted and transferred this case to its docket.
Issues: On Petition for Further Review, Appellant makes the following assignment of error: The Court of Appeals erred in affirming the District Court’s “Order and Satisfaction of Judgments (On Count VI & Attorney Fees)” entered on December 5, 2022.