Meiergerd v. Qatalyst Corporation

Case Number(s)
Case Audio
Call Date
Case Time
Court Number
Case Location
Court Type
District Court
Case Summary

S-22-0939 David Meiergerd (Appellant) v. Qatalyst Corporation and Roland Pinto (Appellees)

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County, Judge Susan I. Strong

Attorneys:  Adam J. Kost (Remboldt Ludkte, L.L.P. for Appellant) and Christopher S. Bartling (Bartling & Hinkle, P.C. for Nebraska for Appellee)

Civil:  Taxable income

Proceedings below:  In a Memorandum Opinion and Judgment on Appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision to sustain Appellee’s motion for satisfaction and discharge of a revived May 2008 default judgment.  Appellant filed a Petition for Further Review, which the Supreme Court granted and transferred this case to its docket. 

Issues:  On Petition for Further Review, Appellant makes the following assignment of error:  The Court of Appeals erred in affirming the District Court’s “Order and Satisfaction of Judgments (On Count VI & Attorney Fees)” entered on December 5, 2022. 

Schedule Code