State v. Rieker

Case Number(s)
S-23-0818
Case Audio
Call Date
Case Time
Court Number
Lancaster
Case Location
Lincoln
Court Type
District Court
Case Summary

S-23-0818 State of Nebraska (Appellee) v. Rieker (Appellant)

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County, Judge Kevin R. McManaman

Attorneys: Carlos Monzon (Monzon, Guerra, & Chipman for Appellant) and Gerald R. Soucie (Attorney at Law for Appellant) and Melissa Vincent (Assistant Attorney General for Appellee)

Criminal: Third-degree assault and false reporting

Proceedings below: After Appellant was convicted of third-degree assault and false reporting, he was sentenced to eighteen (18) months of probation. Appellant filed a Petition to Bypass the Court of Appeals, which the Court sustained and ordered that this case be transferred from the docket of the Court to Appeals to its docket.

Issues: Appellant makes the following assignments of error:  1) The Lancaster County District Court erred in affirming Mr. Rieker’s conviction of misdemeanor assault because as a matter of law the State failed to present evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Rieker’s use of force towards J.N. did not constitute an absolute defense of property as defined by Nebraska statutes, to wit; Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1411; 2) The Lancaster County District Court erred in affirming Mr. Rieker’s conviction of false information because as a matter of law there was insufficient evidence that he “furnished material information he knew to be false to any peace officer or other official with the intent . . . to impede the investigation of an actual criminal matter” as defined by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-907 (1); and 3) The Lancaster County District Court erred as a matter of law in failing to reverse the decision in the one judge opinion in Lancaster County District CR 22-95 reversing the granting the motion to suppress based on the governments violation of Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 (1967) and Kastigar v United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972) docketed at CR 22 - 95 when presented with different testimony at the actual trial and which was contrary to Nebraska law as set forth in State v. Weichman, 292 Neb. 227, 871 N.W.2d 768 (2015).

Schedule Code
SC