Heimes v. Cedar County

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionPDF versionPDF version

Heimes v. Cedar County

Additional Case Names
Heimes v. Arens
Case Number
Call Date
March 7, 2016
Case Time
1:00 PM
Case Summary

A-15-646, Michael and Ceil Heimes (Appellants) v. Cedar County

A-15-650, Michael and Ceil Heimes (Appellants) v. Dennis A. and Mary F. Arens

(Consolidated Appeals)

Cedar County, District Court Judge Paul J. Vaughan

Attorney for Appellants: Thomas H. DeLay (Stratton, DeLay, Doele, Carlson & Buettner)

Attorney for Appellees' Arens: Matthew D. Hammes (Locher Pavelka Dostal Braddy & Hammes)

Attorney for Appellees' Cedar County: Charles W. Campbell (Angle, Murphy & Campbell)

Civil Action: Contract Dispute

Action Taken by Trial Court: The district court overruled the parties' respective motions to object to or dispute the mediation agreement and denied any further mediation.

Assignments of Error on Appeal: The Heimes' assign, consolidated and rephrased, that the district court erred in finding that the mediation agreement was clear and unambiguous and in disallowing any further mediation of disputes pertaining to the mediated settlement agreement regarding the drainage plan.

Case Location
Panel Text
Inbody, Pirtle, and Riedmann, Judges