Stewart v. Pirrucello

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionPDF versionPDF version

Stewart v. Pirrucello

Case Number
Call Date
January 12, 2016
Case Time
1:00 PM
Case Summary

A-14-0856, Paul Stewart and Karina Stewart (Appellants) v. Michael A. Pirrucello

District Court for Douglas County, District Judge Kimberly M. Pankonin

Attorney for Appellant: Laird T. Moore

Attorney for Appellee: Mark S. Dickhute

Civil: Breach of Contract

Action taken by the Trial Court: During trial, the district court denied the Stewarts' oral motion for additional time to offer further evidence. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Pirrucello, holding that the Stewarts had sued the wrong party, the statutory claim brought by the Stewarts was time barred, and the Stewarts had not furnished evidence of damages with respect to their claims.

Assignments of Error and Issues on Appeal: Did the district court err in allowing Pirrucello to offer additional evidence while denying the Stewarts' request to do the same? Did the district court err in granting summary judgment to Pirrucello?

Case Location
Panel Text
Moore, Chief Judge, Inbody, and Bishop, Judges