Caselaw Updates

    Caselaw Updates

    You can click here for achived oral arguments before the Supreme Court, or here for archived oral arguments before the Court of Appeals.

     

    In Re Interest of Joseph S. Et Al.

    Filed on: Friday, October 9, 2015

    In Re Interest of Angeleah M. and Ava M.

    Filed on: Wednesday, October 7, 2015

    In Re Interest of Danajah G. Et Al.

    Filed on: Tuesday, September 15, 2015

    In Re Interest of Nathan L.

    Filed on: Tuesday, September 1, 2015

    In Re Interest of Alex F. and Tony F.

    Filed on: Tuesday, August 25, 2015
    Oral ArgumentRead more

    In Re Interest of Estrellita L.

    Filed on: Tuesday, June 30, 2015

    In Re Interest of Trenton W. et al.

    Filed on: Tuesday, June 16, 2015

    In Re Interest of Jahon S.

    Filed on: Friday, June 12, 2015

    In Re Interest of Jassenia H.

    Filed on: Friday, June 12, 2015

    In Re Interest of Nery V. et al.

    Filed on: Tuesday, June 9, 2015

    In re Interest of Madison V.

    Filed on: Tuesday, April 28, 2015
    Summary: In this case the children were adjudicated under 43-247(3)(a) based upon the faults and habits of the father surrounding a domestic violence incident between the mother and the father. The factual basis for the adjudication included evidence that the father had been drinking prior to the...Read more

    In re Interest of Alexandria et al.

    Filed on: Tuesday, April 28, 2015
    Summary: The Court of Appeals affirmed the Otoe County order terminating the parental rights of Brett H. over his four children. The father argued that the court erred in terminating his rights because the evidence was insufficient, there was a due process violation and the judge erred in denying...Read more

    In re Keisha G.

    Filed on: Tuesday, April 28, 2015
    Summary: The father, Michael G., appealed the termination of his parental rights under 43-292(2) & (7), arguing that there was insufficient evidence and that the court erred in finding that the formal rules of evidence did not apply. The Court of Appeals found that case law is clear that formal...Read more

    In re Interest of Miah S.

    Filed on: Friday, April 3, 2015
    Summary: The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Separate Douglas County Juvenile Court that Miah’s statements to the police on November 19, 2013 were freely, knowingly and voluntarily given. Miah was originally advised of his Miranda rights on November 18, 2013, and the validity of...Read more

    In re Interest of Octavio B. et al.

    Filed on: Friday, April 3, 2015
    Summary: Adopting a new permanency plan of adoption or guardianship was appropriate when Melissa R. failed to comply with the reunification plan and an expert testified that she needed a long period of stability before she could parent. The adoption of a new permanency plan for adoption and...Read more

    Pages