Caselaw Updates
Filed on:
SUMMARY: The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained without a warrant that is admitted in a child protection proceeding. On March 17, 2004, a neighbor reported finding Jasmine alone outside the trailer park where she lived. Jennifer, mother of Corey, Dylan, Jasmine...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: In adjudication proceedings joint representation does not deny due process and ineffective assistance of counsel is not an available claim if appointed pursuant to statute. Heather and two siblings were adjudicated to be within the meaning of §43-247(3)(a) after abuse allegations were...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: Because the testimony of the sole witness for the State was primarily based on hearsay and the testimony from the mother’s therapist that the mother was improving her parenting skills and that the child would be harmed by termination was not contradicted, the State did not prove that...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: Sufficient evidence supported finding the mother caused the death of her child’s sibling and terminating the mother’s parental rights, though there was never a criminal conviction. The State filed a petition on January 24, 2003 to adjudicate Anthony, and filed a motion on April 30, 2003...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: A guardian ad litem appointed in a criminal proceeding cannot file a petition to adjudicate the child in juvenile court. On January 30, 2003, the county court appointed a guardian ad litem for Valentin, who was charged with criminal impersonation. On February 20, the GAL filed a petition in...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: A termination of parental rights was improper when the mother was deported from the country, was not represented at either the adjudication or termination hearings, the record was devoid of any facts to support the case plan, and the mother was not given any provisions or opportunity to...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: Father’s judicial admissions through pleadings and affidavits to being natural father and juvenile court’s implicit adjudication of paternity are sufficient to preclude challenge to paternity. The child’s former guardian ad litem having joined the county attorney’s office does not...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: To establish that reasonable efforts to reunify are not required, the State must provide clear and convincing evidence. The nature and severity of the abuse, the delay in seeking treatment and the ongoing denial by the parents in this case establish that reasonable efforts are not required...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: A conviction of felony child abuse is not sufficient to show that reasonable efforts are not required pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. section 283.01(4)(b)(iv). Preponderance of the evidence must establish “felony assault.” The breaking of a baby’s leg is considered a “serious bodily injury.”...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: During an appeal of termination of parental rights, the parents cannot collaterally attack the adjudication or case plans adopted pursuant to adjudication. The condition of the home, which was the basis for adjudication, was merely a manifestation of the parents’ inability to properly care...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: State could properly file a subsequent motion to terminate a mother’s parental rights due to the mother’s mental illness or deficiency when a prior motion to terminate her parental rights based on repeated neglect was overturned on appeal. Termination was in the children’s best interests...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: When there are allegations against a custodial parent, the burden is on the state to allege and prove that the children should not be placed with other natural parent after the first 48 hours of emergency detention pending adjudication. A petition filed July 23, 2001 alleged that William...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: A separate hearing is not required when a parent challenges the provision of reasonable efforts under Neb. Rev. Stat. section 43-283.01. Although incarceration cannot alone be a basis for termination, the court may consider the facts that led to the incarceration and the parent’s inability...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: The juvenile court had jurisdiction to terminate parental right even though the parent’s admissions to the allegations of the petitions should not have been accepted because of a defective rights advisement because this defect did not taint later proceedings. On June 8, 2000, Nathan called...
Filed on:
SUMMARY: Evidence of severe injuries was sufficient to adjudicate the children when the parents could not offer an explanation as to the injuries but were the child’s primary caregivers. On November 24, 1999, the State filed petitions as to Sarah (DOB: 7/7/1998) and Jason (DOB: 7/29/1999) alleging...